| WG# | Name | Stage Code | Working Group Chair | Sponsoring Council | ICO Liaison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WG02 | Assigning Pathogenicity to a Genetic Variant | 1099 (2013-01-21) | Marc Greenblatt | ISAC | Timothy D. Smith |
| WG03 | Minimal content for gene variant databases (LSDBs) | 2020 (2013-03-15) | Peter Taschner | ISAC | Timothy D. Smith |
| WG04 | Sequence variant description committee | 2020 (2013-10-25) | Johan den Dunnen | ISAC | Timothy D. Smith |
| WG06 | Disease & Phenotype Descriptions in Gene/Disease Specific Databases | 1099 (2014-03-07) | Peter Robinson | G/DSDBAC | Timothy D. Smith |
| WG07 | Minimum Content of a Country Specific Variant Database | 1099 (2014-05-23) | Martina Witsch-Baumgartner | ICCAC | Timothy D. Smith |
| WG08 | Ethics Checklist for Gene/Disease Specific Database Curators and Submitters | 1099 (2014-08-11) | Rosemary Ekong | G/DSDBAC | Timothy D. Smith |
Stage Codes
| 10 Registration | 20 Preparatory Action | 50 Main Activity Begun | 80 Main Activity Complete | 91 Repeat Earlier Stage | 92 Repeat Current Stage | 98 Abandon | 99 Proceed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 00 Initiation Stage |
AP Receieved by ICO | ICO forwards AP with comments to International Scientific Advisory Committee | ISAC determines which body will act as SC | ISAC determination complete | AP referred to SC | |||
| 10 Proposal Stage |
SC Registers AP | AP sent to all SC members | SC votes on AP | Voting complete | AP reffered back to submitter for refinement | AP rejected | Working Group chartered | |
| 20 Preparatory Stage |
Working Group convened | Outline and Schedule of Work submitted | First WD begun | WG vote to accept WD | Further WD required | WG disbanded | WD approved as ED | |
| 30 Consultation Stage |
ED registered by ICO | ED edited by ICO | Consulation Period begun | Consultation finished | WG to address issues raised during consultation | ED accepted | ||
| 40 Approval Stage |
ED and WG response to comments received | Vote scheduled | SC vote to approve publication | Voting complete | WG to address issues raised by SC | Project Abandoned | Draft approved for publication | |
| 50 Final Approval Stage |
ISAC receive approved draft | Vote scheduled | ISAC vote to give final approval | Voting complete | Draft returned to SC for decision | Draft has obtained final approval | ||
| 60 Publication Stage |
HVP Standard or Guideline published on Human Variome Project website |
